Did Jesus Wear a Kippah?

It is certain that Jesus, a Jew residing in the land of Israel in the first century, did not wear a kippah (skullcap).

The custom of wearing a kippah arose in Babylonia between the third and fifth centuries C.E. among the non-Jewish residents—Jewish residents of Babylonia had not yet adopted this custom, as the Dura-Europos frescoes show—and passed from there to the Jewish community of Europe.

Although priests wore a מִגְבַּעַת (mig⋅BA⋅’at, a turban-like headdress; see Exod. 28:4, 40; Lev. 8:13), other Jews of the Second Temple period did not wear a headcovering. This is confirmed both by the literature and archaeological remains of the period. For instance, the reliefs on the Arch of Titus in Rome, which depict the victory procession in Rome following the conquest of Jerusalem in 70 C.E., show the Jewish captives bareheaded. Likewise, the frescoes of the mid-third century C.E. synagogue excavated at Dura-Europos represent all the Jewish men as bareheaded except for Aaron the priest.

Contemporary Jewish sources verify the picture presented in the New Testament:

Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head. And every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head—it is just as though her head were shaved…. A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man.

(1 Cor. 11:4-7)

According to the Babylonian Talmud, Nedarim 30^b, Jewish children were always bareheaded, men sometimes covered their heads and sometimes did not, while women covered their heads at all times. But it must be remembered that this is a late source (end of fifth century C.E.) and reflects Jewish practice in Babylonia.

According to the Shulhan Arukh, the sixteenth-century code of Jewish law compiled by Rabbi Joseph Karo, one should not walk bareheaded even four cubits (two meters) (Orakh Hayyim 2:6). This ruling is derived from the Babylonian Talmud, Kiddushin 31^a, where it is stated that Rav Huna (fourth century C.E.), the son of Rav Yehoshua, would not walk bareheaded four cubits (cf. Babylonian Talmud, Shabbat 118^b). However, this is noted as the exceptional practice of a particular sage, not as a practice observed by all males. The practice of covering one’s head in public apparently was not yet wide-spread in Babylonia in the fourth century C.E.

For more on Jesus’ clothing and appearance, check out these JP articles:

◦ Marvin R. Wilson, “The Appearance of Jesus: Hairstyles and Beards in Bible Times”
◦ JP Staff Writer, “Tangled up in T^echēlet: Tzitzit (Ritual Tassels) in the Time of Jesus”

To read more New Testament insights from professor Shmuel Safrai on Jerusalem Perspective, click here.

And check out these recent JP articles:

• 
  Character Profile: Beelzebul
  Get acquainted with this mysterious and sinister figure.
• 
  What’s Wrong with Contagious Purity? Debunking the Myth that Jesus Never Became Ritually Impure
  The view that Jesus could not be affected by impurity and that Jesus was able to spread his purity to others is based on faulty assumptions and invalid inferences.
• 
  Two Neglected Aspects of the Centurion’s Slave Pericope
  Ritual impurity and the tensions resulting from Roman imperialism are two aspects of the Centurion’s Slave pericope that often go overlooked.
• 
  “They Know Not What They Do”: The History of a Dominical Saying
  How Luke 23:34 became embroiled in the Church’s conflicted relationship with its Jewish Roots.
• 
  Why Do You Call Me ‘Lord’?: On the Origins of Jesus’ Dominical Title
  The confession “Jesus is Lord” is the simplest and earliest Christian creed. But how did referring to Jesus as “Lord” begin?
• 
  Evidence of Pro-Roman Leanings in the Gospel of Matthew
  Hindsight and political expedience shaped the author of Matthew’s view of the Roman Empire.